Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

1
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarification
	
	Q:
	The current Off Site Street improvement plans, # 1 of the General Notes, says to use the February of 2016 edition of the specifications. It’s our understanding that the City will require the use of the most current edition of the city specifications. Please clarify what edition and to which addendum is to be utilized for bidding and construction of this project.
	
	A:

2
	Off Site Water Mains Improvement plans clarification
	
	Q:
	The current Off Site Water Mains Improvement plans have multiple notes that say to “ See separate landscape plans for continuation.” Where are the Off Site landscape plans for bidding and construction? Please advise.
	
	A:
	Offsite Landscape Drawings will be provided in a forthcoming addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/16/23

3
	Building E wall Assembly Clarification
	
	Q:
	REF: E/A101, X/A101. Along grid line 12 between N and K there is a specific wall assembly called out. (6 A I M). General note 1 on the floor plan calls for Exterior walls to (6 B E M) unless specifically noted, such as this case. Please review assemblies and clarify this condition. Please provide sill condition details for this wall and the others that make up this exterior entrance. Be advised Architectural grid line numbering does not match with Structural grid line numbering.
	
	A:
	This was asked prior to issuance of the bid documents please indicate whether or not this is still a question. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/16/23

4
	Building E Foundation Clarification
	
	Q:
	REF: E/S201, A7-E/S406, J11-E/S501, E/A101. At the south wall of the elevated slab area, wall line M from grid line 10.5 to 12 there is a discrepancy on how the foundation is to be constructed to accept the exterior wall. The foundation plan references A7-E/S406 that shows the wall sitting on top of the elevated slab, and back approximately 6” from the edge. This detail references J11-E/S501 as similar. This detail shows the wall sitting at the finish floor elevation, and either the wall alignment moved south or foundation has moved north to the opposite side of the wall. Please clarify.
	
	A:
	Refer to detail A4 on Sheet E/A504 for interaction at concrete stem wall. Wall shall sit inline with exterior face of stem wall as indicated. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/16/23

5
	Building E Stage/elevated slab elevation clarification
	
	Q:
	
REF: E/A104, E/S202. Please clarify the elevation of the stage, and elevated concrete slab. Multiple details on E/A104 show the top of the stage at 3’-6”. Detail N11 specifically shows the stage and concrete in the same detail. Multiple details in the structural drawings show the elevated slab at 3’-7”. On E/S202, specifically detail A4 shows both the stage and elevated slab to be at 3’-7”. Please clarify
	
	A:
	Refer to Building E Documents the Elevation height has been coordinated with Structural. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/16/23

6
	Interior concrete curbs clarification, All Buildings
	
	Q:
	REF: Architectural floor and Structural Foundation plans, and X/A101. Please clarify what interior walls are to have curbs, if any. There are two details on X/A101 that show 6” curbs; one at a depressed slab condition, and the second is not clear, and neither of these have been found to be referenced. All building sections show walls to the floor, no curbs. Please clarify.
	
	A:
	Sheet X/A101 Covers interior conditions, all exterior walls will have a 3 1/2" curb as indicated at the Typical Exterior Detail Sheets. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects, 02/16/23

7
	Brace Frame Sizes
	
	Q:
	Brace sizes per details are missing. A7/B/S402, A4/B/S403, A11/C/S403, A7/D/S402. Please clarify
	
	A:
	For A7-B/S402, A4-B/S403, and A7-D/S402 the brace is to be HSS5x5x5/16. For A11-C/S403 the brace size is to be HSS7x7x1/2. -Scott Carter, Brooks Ransom 02/17/23

8
	Fire Sprinklers
	
	Q:
	The layout of the fire sprinklers does not match the “perimeter” of the canopies. Also, there is main feed piping running “through” the canopies. Is the intent to eliminate the canopies altogether if this option is not chosen, or will the canopies always be built, but not require fire sprinklers if they are not classified as “classrooms”? If they are not built at all, there would be major rerouting of fire sprinkler piping required, which could require DSA resubmittal.
	
	A:
	This only occurs at building D and has been brought to the attention of my engineer. If the add alternate is not chosen the system would need to be functional without the canopy sprinklers. The project is not DSA approved so corrections can be made during bidding to accommodate this. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/15/23

Hollow Metal Doors & Frames
Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

9
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarification
	
	Q:
	Question: Will there be deferred submittals required for HM Frames and openings on this project? The contract documents currently don’t show a requirement for deferred submittals, however it’s been the experience of the sub that deferred submittals are required by DSA for the entire project if any opening breeches the 10’-0” mark. Currently HM-8 is 10’-0” long, so it would follow that this project should have a deferred submittal for the HM Frames. Please clarify.
	
	A:
	This requirement is for any opening over 10'-0", all of the included openings are 10' and below. Deferred submittals are not required for hollow metal or storefront openings. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects, 02/15/23

10
	Wheelchair Lift Substitution Request
	
	Q:
	Division 14 “Or Equal” Product Submittal. “Symmetry Vertical Platform Lift” model UL42 unenclosed lift.
	
	A:
	Side By Side comparison with what is being proposed and what was specified not provided. Substitution was not reviewed. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/21/23

10.1
	Wheelchair Lift Substitution Request
	
	Q:
	Division 14 “Or Equal” Product Submittal. “Symmetry Vertical Platform Lift” model UL42 unenclosed lift.
	
	A:
	No Exception Taken to Substitution Request

11
	Site handrail clarification at amphitheater
	
	Q:
	REF: SD/A101, N1/SD/A302. In the middle of the steps there is a cut section that leads to a view of the handrail. Please clarify if this is intended to be a third handrail in the middle, or just a view of either the rail on the left or right, against the planter wall.
	
	A:
	This center detail cut is intended for the stairs portion only. Handrails are to be provided on each end as indicated only. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architect 02/16/23

12
	Building D Casework Clarification
	
	Q:
	REF: D/A601. There are several elevations with a keynote for casework, that point to windows. Are components of casework to be installed above or below? Please clarify intent at all buildings.
	
	A:
	Refer to the Modular Casework Schedule, These locations include a countertop as scheduled. Similar to what is indicated below. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/16/23

13
	Exterior walls, Rigid insulation, clarifications
	
	Q:
	REF: X/A501, X/A511. Please clarify the locations to receive exterior rigid insulation, in lieu of, exterior gyp. In addition, please confirm the rigid insulation thickness. A11 on X/A511 shows 1”, but this is a curb detail, and not necessarily an insulation detail.
	
	A:
	Refer to X/A101 for wall assemblies, all Exterior walls are to receive 1" rigid insulation as indicated. Wall type A' and B' will be clarified in an addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/16/23

14
	Upper Duct Attachments
	
	Q:
	Ref: Details E11, 14, and A11, 14. Ref: Drawings M800 and S106. Details E11 and 14 and A11 and 14 on Sheet M800 instruct us to go to the Structural Sheets for the upper attachment details however, there is only Detail E4 on S106 which is for hanging mechanical units. Please provide the upper attachment detail for hanging ductwork.
	
	A:
	Details will be provided in a forthcoming addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/22/23

15
	Standing seam roof insulation clarification
	
	Q:
	REF: Spec Section 07 40 00 Metal panels, and X/A 513. Please clarify the required thickness of the insulation, and the height of the Z-Girts on the roof. The plan sheet shows several references to 1” tall Z-Girts. 2.1.A.8,b says the rigid insulation is R MAX- “RE-COVER BOARD-3”, and further goes to say at F.3 that the rigid insulation is to be a minimum of 1 ½” thick unless noted otherwise. What is the intended design thickness of the rigid insulation on top of the roof, as there is no batt insulation shown to be installed at the underside of the roof, where combined could make up the required overall R-Value to meet code.
	
	A:
	An R-30 Thermal Resistance rating is required which will vary in thickness depending on the manufacturer. I will issue some clarification to this. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/16/23

16
	Building E, Smoke vent winch system
	
	Q:
	REF: E/A100, E/A301, E/A602, and spec section 07 72 00. There is a smoke vent on the roof above the stage, and per specification it requires a manual winch for testing. 07 72 00, section C, 4, h indicates that it is to be operational from the floor level at a location indicated on the plans. Where is the designed location, and will additional bracing be required in the metal stud framing or structural steel for it’s support or load tension when in operation?
	
	A:
	Addendum #1 provided direction for mounting the Winch, and will include backing at this location.

Power and Fire Alarm clarification for Smoke V
Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

17
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarificationent
	
	Q:
	REF: E/A301, E/E201, E/E301, E/E501, and spec section 07 72 00. There is a smoke vent on the roof of building E over the stage. The specifications for this vent show that it requires power, and connection to the fire alarm. Neither power nor fire alarm connections are shown on the plans. Please review and advise.
	
	A:
	Smoke Vent Requirements were updated in Addendum #1. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/21/23

18
	Building E, Stage Soffit clarification
	
	Q:
	REF: E/A501. Along grid line 11 there is a curtain wall and soffit. Detail E9 on E/A501 has detail reference circles for this area, but no referenced details within the circles. Please provide details with dimensions, and how this is to interface with the framing of the operable partition wall support pocket.
	
	A:
	Detail J1 I believe what is being referenced in this RFI, this will be provided in a forthcoming addendum. -Andrew Corral Darden Architects, 02/16/23

19
	Foundation and elevations at Modular building clarification
	
	Q:
	REF: Portables Plans, Detail 1/S1.4, project plans SD/C201. There are conflicting elevations for the portable building. The portable building foundation plan shows there is 18” between the bottom of the portables frame structure and the concrete rat slab. The Grading plan shows there is 1’-6” from the finish floor elevation to the top of the rat slab. The structural section of the portable building is 8 1/8” (7” exterior channel and 1 1/8” plywood). This leaves a clearance of only 9 7/8” as apposed to the “Typical 18” as shown in the modular building plans. Please clarify
	
	A:
	Portable elevations will remain as indicated in Increment #1. Jason Master, Blair Church & Flynn

20
	Commissioning
	
	Q:
	Specification Section 23 08 00 Commissioning of HVAC. Part 1.2, B. Related Sections:
1. Division 01 Section "General Commissioning Requirements" for general commissioning process requirements. The Specifications do not include Division 01 Section General Commissioning Requirements. Please advise if this section will be included in the Project Specifications.
	
	A:

21
	Glazing Sheet B/A101
	
	Q:
	1) On page B/A101- Floor Plan Opening callouts 108m, 108n, 108o, 108p, are called out on the floor plans but are not on the X/A403 -OPENING SCHEDULE. Please clarify if opening should be SF32. If not please provide correct opening. 2) On page B/A101- Floor Plan in room 100 there is no Opening callout for the opening adjacent to door 100a, also in room 107 there is no window callout for the opening adjacent to door 107g. Can you provide a callout/ dimension for these two.
	
	A:
	These sheets have been revised to include the missing information. Refer to the forthcoming addendum for the revisions. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/21/23

22
	Glazing Sheet C/A101
	
	Q:
	1) On page C/A101- Floor Plan Rooms 106/107 do not have Opening callouts for windows. – Please confirm if opening callouts; 106c, 106d, 106e, 106f, 107c, 107d, 107e, 107f should be used, & if so, please provide correct locations. 2) On page C/A101- Floor Plan in room 106 there is no Opening callout for the opening adjacent to door 106b. Please clarify if opening 106a Sf-21 should be used. If not please provide correct opening. 3) On page C/A101- Floor Plan in room 107 there is no window callout for the opening adjacent to door 107a. Please clarify if opening 107b Sf-21 should be used. If not please provide correct opening. 4) On page C/A101- Floor Plan Opening callouts 108m, 108n, 108o, 108p, are called out on the floor plans but are not on the X/A403 - OPENING SCHEDULE. Please confirm if these opening are to be SF32. If not please provide correct opening. 5) On page C/A101- Floor Plan Opening callouts 108n, 108k are called out on the floor plans but are not on the X/A403 - OPENING SCHEDULE.
	
	A:
	These sheets have been revised to include the missing information. Refer to the forthcoming addendum for the revisions. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/21/23

23
	Glazing Sheet D/A101
	
	Q:
	1) On page D/A100- Floor Plan Opening callouts 110m, 110n, 110o, 110p, are called out on the floor plans but are not on the X/A403 -OPENING SCHEDULE. Please confirm if these opening are to be SF32. If not please provide correct opening. 2) On page D/A100- Floor Plan in rooms 102/103 there is no Opening callout for the openings adjacent to doors 102f, 103g. Please confirm if these opening are to be SF-35 for 102g and SF-35 for 103f. If not please provide correct openings.
	
	A:
	These sheets have been revised to include the missing information. Refer to the forthcoming addendum for the revisions. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/21/23

Glazing Sheet E/A101
Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

24
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarification
	
	Q:
	On page E/A101 - FLOOR PLAN Opening callouts for 100n, 100m, and 100l, are not on the Opening Schedule, but 100h, 100i, 100j are and they are not on the Floor Plan. Please confirm if these opening callouts are correct and if so are they to be type SF-27. If not please clarify and provide correct openings.
	
	A:
	These sheets have been revised to include the missing information. Refer to the forthcoming addendum for the revisions. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/21/23

25
	Glazing Sheet K/A101
	
	Q:
	On page K/A101 - FLOOR PLAN Building K1 Opening call out 101b is noted, but it is not on the Opening Schedule, also 101j is on the opening schedule and not on the floor plan. Please confirm if the openings should be 101b is 101j SF-30. If not please clarify and provide correct openings.
	
	A:
	These sheets have been revised to include the missing information. Refer to the forthcoming addendum for the revisions. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/21/23

26
	Concrete Specification Section 033000 Materials & Admixtures
	
	Q:
	Please clarify the use of fiber reinforcing, integral colored concrete pigment, & integral concrete waterproofing as depicted in Spec section 033000, Products 2.1, admixtures 2, b, c, & e. And referenced in materials admixtures section 2.2, 4 admixtures, d, e, & g. It does not appear that these materials are specifically called out on the plans. Please advise.
	
	A:
	The Use of these materials will be clarified in a forthcoming addendum. -Andrew corral Darden Architects 02/22/23

27
	Rake & Pitch Top Track
	
	Q:
	Please confirm if it is acceptable to use SLOTTED Pitch Track in lieu of the (2) piece slip track noted on J7/XS109. Please confirm if it is acceptable to use SLOTTED Rake Track ln lieu of Slotted Clips noted on A7/XS109.
	
	A:
	It is acceptable to use slotted pitch track in lieu of the (2) piece track on J7-X/S109. It is acceptable to use slotted rake track in lieu of the (2) piece track on A7-X/S109.
Scott Carter, Brooks Ransom 02/22/23

28
	Wall to Steel Connection
	
	Q:
	REFERENCE DRAWING: J14, N11/ XS601, J1/XS109, SPECIFICATION: 092216. Please Advise if Exterior wall will: 1) Connect to Roof Deck per J7/XS109? OR 2) Have a Steel Bent Plate W/ Drift System per J1/XS109?
	
	A:
	At details referenced provide drift system per J1-X/S109. Eric Bain, Brooks Ransom Associates 2023-03-01

29
	METAL FRAMING @ METAL PANEL SOFFITS
	
	Q:
	DRAWING: N11/XS601, A12/ XA541, SPECIFICATION: 092216. N11/XS601 does NOT mention Metal Framing @ Metal Panel Soffits. A12/ XA541 DOES mention Framing @ this condition. Please confirm that there is NO Metal Framing @ Metal Panel Soffits except for Hat Rack (Installed by Others) per Structural Detail.
	
	A:
	Per detail A12-X/A541 there is a soffit. Provide soffit framing per detail N4-X/S109. Eric Bain, Brooks Ransom Associates 2023-03-01

30
	BACKING FOR REGLETS
	
	Q:
	DRAWING: K18/XA601, XA511, J11/XA431, X/A513, SPECIFICATION: 092216. 1) Details show backing for Reglet’s to be Flat Strap and others show it to be Stud or Track. Pease confirm what material is to be used. 2) Is backing required at All Roof Transitions?
	
	A:
	Refer to the next addendum for clarity on backing. Backing will be required at all locations indicated. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/21/23

31
	TRACK @ EXTERIOR OPENINGS
	
	Q:
	
DRAWING: J1, N1, N7/ XA421, L7/ XA411, SPECIFICATION: 092216. Details call for Track at openings, some with (1) leg removed. All details noted above reference Storefront Openings. G11/XA411 shows angle at interior openings. Please clarify materials to be used.
	
	A:
	The details have been updated to indicate this track at both HM frame and Storefront locations in Addendum#4. Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 03/03/23

32
	BUILDING K- GRID LINES
	
	Q:
	DRAWING: STRUCTURAL, SPECIFICATION: 092216. Architectural and Structural Gridlines do not match. Which one do we use for reference?
	
	A:
	The Structural Drawings shall be revised in a forthcoming addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects

33
	NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS
	
	Q:
	SPECIFICATION: 01320. Notice to contractors mentions Schedule in 01320. Spec is not provided. What is the time frame for the Notice to Proceed?
	
	A:
	Schedule was provided in Addendum 1 with the Scope packages. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/22/23

ACOUSTICAL/ SMOKE WALLS
Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

34
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarification
	
	Q:
	DRAWING: J14/ XA101, SPECIFICATION: 092900. J14/ XA101 notes Acoustical Walls and Specs call out Sound and Smoke walls. How are these specific walls called out?
	
	A:
	Verify Detail referenced in Question, the Typical Wall Assemblies legend (F18- X/A101) does not make reference to Smoke or Acoustical walls as neither are present in this project. Provide Sound and Fire rated walls as indicated in the documents. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/22/23

35
	EXTERIOR SHEATHING
	
	Q:
	DRAWING: A11/XA101, N1/XA421, SPECIFICATION: 092900. Wall types @ Plaster show Rigid Insulation but is labeled Sheathing. 1) Please confirm there is NO Exterior Sheathing @ Metal Panels. 2) Please clarify if Cement Plaster walls receive Sheathing. N1/XA421 shows Sheathing @ Plaster walls.
	
	A:
	This was Clarified in Addendum 1. Provide wall assemblies as indicated on revised Sheet X/A101. -Andrew Corral Darden Architects 02/22/23

36
	FLAT STRAP BACKING
	
	Q:
	DRAWING: X/A511, A7/XA511, SPECIFICATION: 092216. Some details on A/X511 do NOT show Flat Strap. A7/XA511 shows Flat Strap @ Plaster locations. N11/XA531 calls it out as Sheet Metal Backing. Please clarify locations where Flat Strap is needed. Is Flat Strap Backing needed @ all Metal Hat Rack locations per X/A511?
	
	A:
	Metal Panels Shall be installed as detailed on the Typical Wall attachment section, N18- X/A511. a Revised sheet will be issued to clarify. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/22/23

37
	Z FURRING
	
	Q:
	DRAWING: X/A511, SPECIFICATION: 092216. Per X/A511, there are some details that show Z Furring with Rigid Insulation and some that don’t. Please clarify if the Z Furring is needed. Per A9/XA513, Z Furring is to be installed by Metal Panel Sub. Please clarify if Z furring is to be installed by Metal panel sub.
	
	A:
	Refer to the Typical Wall attachment detail for the requirements at metal panel. z-furring is not indicated at 1" rigid insulation at wall locations. Per N11-X/A513 Typical Roof Attachment z-furring is required. Darden Architects does not assign work to specific contractors via drawings and specifications. Refer to the Bid Packages document, produced by BUSH Construction, for clarification. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/22/23

38
	STEEL CONFIRMATION
	
	Q:
	DRAWING: J14/ BS404, C/S404, SPECIFICATION: 092216. 1) Please confirm there is no Steel. 2) Wall Framing will go from 0’-0” to Roof Deck with attachment similar to J7/XS109.
	
	A:
	The steel framing is miss aligned. There is steel, attach light gauge wall framing per detail J1-X/S109 Eric Bain, Brooks Ransom Associates 2023-03-01

39
	STRUCTURAL BEAM PLACEMENT VS. ARCHITECTURAL DIMENSIONS
	
	Q:
	DRAWING: VARIOUS LOCATIONS, SPECIFICATION: 092216. There are many locations that show walls landing under beam per Structural, while Architectural show wall bypassing beam at same location. Please clarify. EXAMPLE: N1/AA501 shows beam outside of wall for A building, G.L. 8. Structural show beam to beam with partial X brace. Please clarify.
	
	A:

40
	STRUCTURAL SECTION VIEWS
	
	Q:
	DRAWING: Structural, SPECIFICATION: 092216. Please provided section views for: 1) Building A- South Elevation- G.L. 4-5, J-K. 2) Building A- G.L. E-F, 4-6. 3) Building K1- G.L. 1. 4) Building K2- G.L. 3.
	
	A:

41
	STRUCTURAL ATTACHMENT
	
	Q:
	DRAWING: A7/ES406, SPECIFICATION: 092216. Please provide preferred method of attachment @ A7/ES406, near G.L. M, along with Alcove walls near this location. Are they to be per J1/ XS109 or J7/XS109?
	
	A:
	Attach wall to steel framing per similar typical detail J1-X/S109.
Eric Bain - Brooks Ransom Associates	02/23/2023

42
	CEMENT BOARD @ TILE LOCATIONS
	
	Q:
	DRAWING: X/A201, SPECIFICATION: 092900. Finish schedule shows SYS-IWD Cement Board and Spec section 092900 calls for Water Resistant board. Please Clarify which Board is to be used @ tile locations.
	
	A:
	Water Resistant Gypsum board is acceptable. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/23/23

43
	FULL HEIGHT DRYWALL
	
	Q:
	DRAWING: FLOOR PLANS, SPECIFICATION: 092900. At furred wall locations, is Drywall needed behind furred wall OR may Drywall run along face of furred wall and return back to Full Height wall, continuing to deck?
	
	A:
	Drywall is not needed behind Wall types A or B as indicated in the documents. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 2/22/23

Detail Clarification
Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

44
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarification
	
	Q:
	DRAWING #: B/A501 Detail N1 & X/A421 Detail H18. On B/A501 section view N1 at gridlines 1 & 7, detail H18 on X/A421 is called out at window location. This detail does not align or match the RCP and interior elevation at these two rooms. Please clarify if detail H18 on X/A421 applies to these and sim. Locations. Please note this situation/discrepancy occurs at other buildings and locations.
	
	A:

45
	Section View Detail Clarification
	
	Q:
	DRAWING #: B/A502 detail J11, X/A421 detail H18. At building B section view B/A502-J11 cuts through building at gridlines 3 to 3.7. This section view near gridline E does not align with interior elevation, RCP and structural details at these locations. Is it possible to get revised detailing for interior elevations, RCP's and structural details to match what exactly is being required for a complete finish product at these locations? Please note this occurs at two locations each of buildings B,C and D.
	
	A:
	Details revised in Addendum#4.
Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 03/03/23

46
	Wall Finishes /Accents clarification
	
	Q:
	REF: A/A603, X/a201, Attached screen shot. What is the material that looks a bit like stick trees? There are no keynotes, and it isn’t listed on the finish schedule. Is this paint, vinyl, or wallcoverings?
	
	A:
	This is modular casework. See the modular casework group number b 113.

47
	Fowler Avenue Offsite Work
	
	Q:
	Is it possible to have the offsite designer (B.C.F.) to provide a cross section or an existing topo for the work along Fowler Ave?
	
	A:

48
	Glass
	
	Q:
	Reference: Sheets X/A-401 thru X/A-405, Spec. Section 08 80 00. 1) The door and window schedules list C-1 (clear), G-1 (Graylite ll), & G2-2 (gray low-e) types of glass. Please verify that you require both Gray and Graylite ll in the job. 2) Please indicate glass type for Bldg. A, doors 101 a & 102 b.
	
	A:
	This Will be clarified in a forthcoming Addendum.

49
	Door / Frame Schedules
	
	Q:
	Reference: Sheets X/A401 thru X/A405, Specification Section 08 80 00. 1) Please verify bldg. A, door 103 b will be a wood door in a storefront frame. 2) Bldgs. B, C, & D opening schedules are missing "Above" clerestory windows. 3) Bldg. B opening schedule appears to be missing 100 b? window at classroom entry.
	
	A:
	
1) Provide Door as indicated. 2) Duplicate RFI Question. 3) Duplicate RFI Question. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/22/23

50
	Floor Plans Opening Indicators
	
	Q:
	Reference: Floor Plans. 1) Window Indicators are missing on floor plans: Please indicate. Bldg. B: Rooms 100, 101, 106, & 107 (Interior). Bldg. C: Rooms 100, 101, 106, & 107 (interior & exterior). Bldg. D: Rooms 102 & 103 (interior). 2) I believe there are 2 window Indicators are not needed in Bldg. C rooms 103 & 104. Please verify. 3) Bldg. E - East side - "Above" clerestory window indicators to not match opening schedule indicators. Please clarify.
	
	A:
	
1) This is a duplicate RFI question. 2) unsure of this question, all window tags included are needed. 3) This is a duplicate RFI question. Please review other RFI's prior to submitting additional duplicate questions. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/22/23

50.1
	Floor Plans Opening Indicators
	
	Q:
	Reference: Floor Plans. 2) There are 2 window Indicators are not needed in Bldg. C rooms 103 & 104. Please verify. Clarification: the “unneeded” window tags are 108 n & 108 k that are by the North wall in rooms 104 & 103.
	
	A:
	Those have been removed. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/23/23

51
	Storefront
	
	Q:
	Reference: Spec. Section 08 41 00. 1) Spec 08 41 00, sec. 1.5.2.a.2 states that stamped calcs are required when storefronts are indicated to comply with design loads, etc. Since none of the storefront is over 10' tall, please verify if structural calcs are required. 2) Please verify storefront SF-31 will not be used.
	
	A:
	Correct No Deferred Approvals are indicated for Storefronts. SF-31 will be clarified in a forthcoming Addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/22/23

Service Windows
Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

52
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarification
	
	Q:
	
Reference: Plan Sheets X/A411 & X/A431, Spec. Section 08 56 59. Service window spec 085659 was provided and service windows are detailed. There are no service windows indicated on window schedule. Please verify if they are required or indicate where they are.
	
	A:
	Sheet X/A405 will be updated to indicate the service window locations in a forthcoming addendum. Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/22/23

53
	Bldg. E / door 100e
	
	Q:
	Reference: Plan Sheet X/A431, Spec. Section 10 05 00. Please provide specs for Bldg. E / door 100 e folding door. Spec 100500 contains specs for folding partition, but does contain folding doors.
	
	A:
	This specification section will be added in a forthcoming addendum. Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/22/23

54
	Glass Clarification
	
	Q:
	Reference: Spec. Section 08 80 00. Spec 088000 specifies G2-2 and G2-2T as gray with SN 54 low-e on the #2 surface. This make-up is unavailable. Please provide another make-up. Please verify PPG SolarGray SB70 (#2) will be acceptable. See attached chart.
	
	A:
	We would need to be provided with Samples of PPG Solar Gray (#2) to determine if it is equivalent aesthetically. This can be done as a substitution request now or after award. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/23/23

55
	Elevations and Grades
	
	Q:
	1. In reference to the off-site plans, there are no existing elevations on the plan views. Please provide the elevations for the existing edges of asphalt and centerline on the plans. 2. Please provide original dirt grades of Fowler and McKinley.
	
	A:

56
	Doors Under Stage
	
	Q:
	The doors under the stage (#100l, 100m, 100n, 100o, 100p and 100q) do not have hardware groups listed for them. There is a detail indicating a latch bolt and continuous hinge. Please have the architect identify and create the hardware groups for these doors so we can complete our estimate for this project. Please note: there are many different items that could be used and are very costly. Additionally, I am confused on whether or not these doors are fire rated or not. See detail N14-E/A104. Please advise.
	
	A:
	A hardware group for these doors will be included in a forthcoming addendum. These Doors are not indicated to be fire rated. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/22/23

57
	Doors 108 e and 108 h
	
	Q:
	Reference: Sheets X/A401 thru X/A405, Spec Section 08 80 00. Opening door schedule, bldg. B, doors 108 e & 108 h indicated as SF-1 frames. Please verify they are supposed to be SF-14 per window schedule.
	
	A:
	This will be corrected in a forthcoming addendum. -Andrew corral, Darden Architects 02/22/23

58
	Safes
	
	Q:
	There are two locations which provide information about the safe to be included in the project. One is located in section 10.05.00 Miscellaneous Specialties. The other is in section 11.16.16 Safes. Both reference a different model of safe to be supplied. Please clarify which safe is to be provided and update the specifications to reflect the correction.
	
	A:
	This will be clarified in an forthcoming addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/22/23

59
	Detail Clarification
	
	Q:
	Details N11 – X/A501 & J11 – X/A511 shows the typical parapet conditions with elastomeric Membrane roofing at the back of the parapet. In both details the board behind the elastomeric roofing is called out as both a Gypsum board and as a roof board. Please clarify if the board identified is to be a roof board or a gypsum board as this will have bearing on which bid package this scope of work is included in.
	
	A:
	This will be clarified in an forthcoming addendum. -Andrew corral, Darden Architects 02/23/23

60
	Grease Waste Piping
	
	Q:
	There is no specification for Grease Waste piping for the project, can we assume it is the same material as the sanitary waste?
	
	A:
	
grease waste piping will be the same cast iron material as specified for soil/waste piping. Hannah Brigdon, NetPositive 02/23/23

T-Bar Backing
Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

61
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarification
	
	Q:
	Reference: X/A602 DETAIL N11 & X/A601 DETAILS N14 & K18. Continuous backing is called out for T-bar per XA601 detail N11. Please clarify if backing for T-bar may be per detail K18 on X/A601. Detail K18 is much more cost effective compared to backing per X/A601 detail N14.
	
	A:
	This would need buy off from DSA for this change and would have to be a cost savings opportunity after the project is awarded. While we are in favor of it, the Acceptance of this alternative attachment cannot be made at this time.
-Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/23/23

62
	Walk-In Cooler and Freezer
	
	Q:
	
The Walk-in Cooler & Freezer. The specifications and equipment schedule both listed Dura-Cool. Upon researching we found out that it is Harford Duracool and not Dura-Cool. There is another walk-in manufacturer which is Dura-Cold. Is it Dura Cool or Dura-Cold?
	
	A:
	Dura-Cool was the manufacturer provided by the district as their preferred new manufacturer. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/23/23

63
	Testing Lab Services
	
	Q:
	1) In Specification section 014529- Testing Laboratory Services, Section 1.1.A.b.2) it notes that the Owner Shall pay for inspection except as stated: “Cost of Testing (due to Shop Fabrication on in-plant testing out of state and beyond a 75 mile radius of the project site) shall be back-charged to the Contractor, and those excess cost will be deducted from the Contract Price.” Please verify: a) that since our shop is within the same state as the project, no back charges will be applied. b) If it was intended to note, out of state OR beyond a 75 mile radius of the project site, can an exception be made if we are at approx. 100 miles from the jobsite? (in Bakersfield). c) If back-charges are assessed, please provide at what rates will be applied so that we can properly include these additional costs into our proposal.
	
	A:
	We will make the adjustment in a Forthcoming addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/23/23

64
	Cement Plaster Vent
	
	Q:
	Reference Drawing: RCP, Specification: 09 24 00. RCP does not show Plaster Vent @ all buildings. Please confirm that Vent is NOT needed.
	
	A:
	Venting is not required. -Andrew corral, Darden Architects 02/23/23

65
	Sheathing at Backside of Parapets
	
	Q:
	Reference Drawing: N14, J11/XA501, Specification: 09 29 00. N14, J11/XA501 does not show Sheathing behind Plaster. Other details do show Sheathing.
Please confirm that Sheathing is needed @ backside of Parapets for Plaster and Elastomeric Roofing.
	
	A:
	This will be clarified in the forthcoming addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects, 02/23/23

66
	Fixture Type Not Labeled
	
	Q:
	Reference Sheets A-E101, B-E101. Please see the attached sheets in question, the fixture is not labeled. Please clarify.
	
	A:
	I confirmed with HDE that they picked up the items mentioned in these RFIs in their revised addendum drawings.

67
	Fixture Type Not Labeled - C-E101. D-E101
	
	Q:
	Reference Sheets: C-E101, D-E101. Please see the attached sheets in question, the fixture is not labeled. Please clarify.
	
	A:
	I confirmed with HDE that they picked up the items mentioned in these RFIs in their revised addendum drawings.

68
	Building A, HVAC Clarification.
	
	Q:
	Building A, HVAC clarification. REF: A/M101-103, A/M301. In Electrical room 120, and Telecom 104, please clarify the HVAC and venting.
	
	A:

69
	Standing Seam Roof Panels
	
	Q:
	standing seam roof panels. The basis of design calls for a SRS-3 panel which is a 3” high T- Panel whereas the Taylor Metal Product MS-200 is a 2” High Lock- Seam Panel. These two are completely different panels. Please confirm it is acceptable to use the Taylor Metals MS-200 in lieu of the Basis of design Centria SRS-3 Panel.
	
	A:
	As indicated in the specifications the Taylor Metal Products Standing Seam roof is an acceptable alternative. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/27/23

CES-12 Clarifications
Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

70
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarification
	
	Q:
	In the summary of work for CES-12, you list playground equipment and bleachers but there are no specifications on those 2 items. Please advise. Also a question regarding clean up, we are responsible for all General Sprecialtie's debris and nothing else correct? Thank you for your response.
	
	A:
	The Bleachers are on detail E on SD/X107. These are in the Increment 1 drawings, and they are included with all the Increment 2 drawings, further down the list. The playground equipment is on the same page. The spec will be included in Addenda #2.
6. Playstructures. a. Playcraft Systems Structure #’s R35CEB77A and RH5A1279A or approved equal. Install per manufacturer’s recommendations. Structures to comply with 2016 CBC 11B-1008.
As for Clean up: This package has all the waste management. Dumpsters, fees, tracking, etc. All the trades put their trash in those dumpsters. This package also has all the building final cleaning.

71
	Concrete Curbs
	
	Q:
	
Please clarify where the slab-on-grade concrete curbs are to be placed. The Architectural and Structural drawings do not clearly define.
	
	A:
	To be addressed in Addenda #2.

72
	Electrical Clarifications
	
	Q:
	1) If alternate 2 isn’t taken wouldn’t we need to add emergency light at exit doors? 2) Sheet D/E101 should classroom 109 have a H4 Fixture just outside door?
3) Sheet E/E101 room 100 MPR should the flush cans be fixture type H6?
4) There are 6 lights on grid line 3/4 corridor on both B/E101 and C/E101 being fed from PP what are these fixtures and how do they mount?
	
	A:
	1) This has been addressed in Addendum 2. 2) This will need to be added in a forthcoming addendum. 3) This has been addressed in Addendum 2. 4) These are indicated to be mounted to the soffit Above or below depending on location. See J1/ J4 on X/A603 for additional information. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/27/23

73
	Metal Panels and Insulation Clarificactions
	
	Q:
	1. Please provide the R-Value/Thickness of the rigid insulation required for the metal roofing and metal wall panels. 2. Please confirm that Hunter is an acceptable manufacturer in lieu of RMAX. (we have used Hunter Insulation on most if not all Darden projects). 3. Please confirm if the welding of the Z-Purlins/Girts to the metal deck for the standing seam metal roofing is required throughout all the buildings. If not, please provide direction/clarification on which areas of the roofs required welding. 4. Please confirm that Taylor Metal MS-200/Garland RMER Span per spec 07 40 00 Metal Panels is acceptable in lieu of Centria SRS-3. The basis of design panel has a 3” tall panel rib, and the alternate options have a 2” tall panel rib. The panel ribs are also a different. We want to confirm that if we carry a price for the acceptable alternates listed in the specs, that there is no obligation to provide basis of design, and we can use acceptable alternates.
	
	A:
	1) Indicated in Addendum 1 Typical Roof detail. 2) This will be addressed in a forthcoming Addendum. (We have accepted it on past projects as you mentioned). 3) The detail indicates that welding is only required in locations where the deck is exposed from below. 4) As indicated in previous RFI the Panel listed as an acceptable alternate in the specifications is indeed acceptable for this project. -Andrew Corral, Darden Achitects 02/27/23

74
	Off-Site Clarifications
	
	Q:
	1) No topographic survey was included. Please advise if existing elevations for off-site will be provided or not. These elevations are required in order to get an approximate roadway excavation quantity. 2) Please confirm that the owner is paying for all of the City and County of Fresno fees. There are some plan fees on sheet 1 of 3 within addendum number 2. 3) Can Fowler Avenue be closed in order to construct the off-site improvements? If so, for how long?
	
	A:

75
	Folding Door 110 e
	
	Q:
	Reference: 08 41 13, Folding Door
E Building, page E/A101, door 100 e has a column in the middle of the opening at grid line F.
Please provide clarification and or details on how the folding door is going to be install around the column.
	
	A:
	This will be revised in a forthcoming addendum, the column is placed in error. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/28/23

HM-4 Frame
Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

76
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarification
	
	Q:
	Reference: 08 80 00. Addenda #2 added Service windows into HM-4 frame.
1) Please verify that there will be a HM mullion added in between the two service windows for support.
2) Building E, frames 118Aa a & 119 b are listed to get HM-4 frames and are also listed to be 60-minute rated. Please provide a spec for fire rated service windows.
	
	A:
	1) This will be added in an upcoming addendum. 2) This will be revised in an upcoming addendum. Andrew Corral Darden Architects 02/28/23

77
	Thermostats
	
	Q:
	On the mechanical schedules for the HC units, note #3 indicates to use 7-day programmable thermostats for each unit. Historically with CUSD, the use of these types of thermostats has not been accepted and the temperature controls contractor was required to control the package unit from a DDC controller mounted at the unit with a digital sensor below in the space. Please clarify if the use of a BACnet communicating thermostat is acceptable in the space or if a DDC controller is required at the package unit.
	
	A:
	Provide DDC controller mounted on package units with a digital sensor located in the space the package unit serves. See revised schedule sheets (X/M102 & X/M103) per Addendum #4.
Hannah Brigdon, PE
Net Positive Consulting Engineers 03-02-2023

78
	CAT6 Communication Cabling
	
	Q:
	1.02/A of the Division 25 Integrated Automation Spec notes that “all control wiring” must be in conduit. Please clarify if that also includes CAT6 communication cabling or if those can be exposed in accessible areas above the ceiling.
	
	A:
	All control wiring, including CAT6 communication cabling, shall be in conduit per Division 25 specifications. Hannah Brigdon, PE
Net Positive Consulting Engineers 03-02-2023

79
	IDU/ODU's
	
	Q:
	On sheet X/M110 there is a note that the VRF system is to be provided with a BACnet gateway and VRF is to be integrated into the campus EMS. However there is nothing that indicates the single zone IDU/ODU’s are to be integrated into the campus EMS via BACnet. Are these single zone IDU/ODU’s to come with their own BACnet gateways/comm cards or are they standalone not integrated into the EMS system?
	
	A:
	Single zone IDU/ODU's shall be integrated into the campus EMS via BACnet. See additional notes regarding BACnet interface for single zone split systems (sheet X/M110) and revised EMS System Diagram (sheet X/M111) per Addendum #4.
Hannah Brigdon, PE
Net Positive Consulting Engineers 03-02-2023

80
	EMS Connections
	
	Q:
	Sheet X/M111 shows EMS connections to a water meter and a electrical power meter. Please clarify where these devices will be physically installed and how they will be communicating to the EMS (BACnet IP, MSTP, OTHER)
	
	A:
	EMS connections to water meter and electrical power meter removed from EMS System Architecture diagram on sheet X/M111. See revised sheet as part of Addendum #4.
Hannah Brigdon, PE
Net Positive Consulting Engineers 03-02-2023

81
	Keynote 3 on X/M111
	
	Q:
	Please clarify keynote #3 on sheet X/M111. Typically, the main VRF controller is supplied to the mechanical contractor along with the VRF system. It is provided and installed by Mechanical Div. 23. Controls contractor is responsible for providing conduit and communication wire to the VRF panel for EMS integration. Please confirm that the VRF panel is provided by the mechanical contractor along with the other VRF equipment.
	
	A:
	The Architect and Engineers do not Delegate work. This would need to be addressed by the The CM Contractor. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 02/28/23

Kindergarten Building Power
Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

82
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarification
	
	Q:
	Observation: The bid form describes Add Alternate 1 as “Kindergarten Building” (doesn’t specify K1 or K2). When we look at the power single line on sheet X/E301, we see that the design flow has incoming power coming first to “Panel KH” (480V). Power is then fed to “Panel KH1” (480V) from “KH”. This implies that “KH” will be in the base bid, with “KH1” being added if the alternate is accepted. However, sheet K/E201 shows “KH” in the add alternate building (see A1 & L7 details). Question: How will the base bid building be powered if the alternate building is not awarded? Shouldn’t the building names (“K1” & “K2”) be swapped?
	
	A:
	Refer to Addendum #4 for response. - Scott Davidson HDE

83
	Rated Service Windows
	
	Q:
	Reference: Section 08 56 59. Addenda 2 modified HM-4 frame to have service windows. Building E, doors 118A & 119b call for HM-4 and are 60-minute rated. Spec 08 56 59 list CRL, Frye-Tek, & Horton as acceptable manufacturers.
1) Horton and CRL do not make rated service windows. Frye-tek just informed me that they will not quote it because they do not meet the specs. Please advise. 2) Please verify wire glass (per spec 085659) is an acceptable rated glass.
	
	A:
	The Coiling door would be the element keeping the fire rating not the service window. This will be clarified in the next Addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects

84
	Glass and Glazing
	
	Q:
	1) Please see AD2-SP05, Glazing change – Our glazing vendor states we cannot do ¼” Low-E since it is a soft-coat. They gave us a few options. We can use ¼” Monolithic Grey Eclipse Advantage, ¼” SolarCool Gray, or 5/16” (Laminated Clear + Gray interlayer + Solarban 70). Please advise. 2) Please see AD2-AX07 / X/A405 – Window Type SF-17 and other similar type have an angle and appear to be butt-jointed glass without a vertical member at the angle location. Our metal vendor states a vertical member is required to meet the dead load requirement of the glass on the intermediate horizontal. We can either add the vertical member or remove the intermediate horizontal since the dead load of the glass will be on the sill. Please advise.
	
	A:
	This will be revised in a forthcoming addendum. The Horizontal Mullion will be removed at the angled portion a forthcoming addendum. Thank you for the suggestions. Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 03/01/23

85
	Video Surveillance
	
	Q:
	We have the following 2-Part question:
1) Video Surveillance Specification Section 27 80 00 calls for a complete Video Surveillance System including IP Network Cameras, NVR, KVMs, etc. (see attached spec page). However, project plans indicate that project scope is limited to camera infrastructure only (see attached snip from symbol legend). Please clarify if furnishing and installing the cameras (and the other listed equipment) are actually part of project scope.
2) If we are to furnish cameras, the drawings do not indicate if the cameras are 45 or 360 degree cameras. Please quantify for each type (as there is a significant cost difference between types).
	
	A:
	CAMERAS SHALL BE OWNER FURNISHED AND CONTRACTOR INSTALLED. - SCOTT D. HDE 3/1/23

86
	Site Lighting Conduit and Wire Size
	
	Q:
	Reference: Sheets SD/E101 & SD/E102
I have not been able to find the wire and conduit sizes required for the site lighting on the 2 plan sheets mentioned. Please Clarify.
	
	A:
	1" minimum conduit as per the symbol schedule describing underground conduit. Pull #10 conductors and ground throughout site lighting 277-volt circuits. Omit the #14 violet/pink dimming conductors to pole lights as those are equipped with occupancy sensors. - Scott D. HDE 3/1/23

87
	OCIP and Builders Risk Insurance
	
	Q:
	
1) Per Addendum #1, OCIP document, page 3, Item a. “General Liability Deductibles: For Each Contractor per occurrence”, requirements state that Subcontractors shall be responsible for the first $5000 of any GL or Contractors Pollution Liability losses. Pollution Liability is not listed as an insurance coverage within the OCIP policy. Please confirm that OCIP provides this coverage for Subcontractors, and if so, what the policy limits are. Please also confirm that if Subcontractors are required to provides Pollution Liability, and if so, what the policy limits requirements are. 2) Pursuant to General Conditions, Section 00700, Article 16(j), Please confirm that Builder’s Risk Insurance is part of the Owner Provided Insurance Policies. If so, please confirm coverages for owner’s Builder’s Risk policy includes All Other Perils (AOP), Flood, and Earthquake, and provide coverage limits for each of these coverages. Please also confirm that, if this policy is part of the Owner Provided Insurance Policies, that the Contractor has no risk of loss outside of this policy for course of construction losses. Please also provide deductible limits that the Contractor would be responsible for.
	
	A:

88
	Panel Schedules
	
	Q:
	We cannot find panel schedules for Panel PYH & BBH. Also missing is Panel schedules for MINI power Zones PYL and BBL.
	
	A:
	These are described in the keynotes on the site plans. - Scott D. HDE 3/2/23

Roof Hydrant
Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

89
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarification
	
	Q:
	The scheduled HB-2 Roof Hose Bibb Woodford #Y24 is a Yard Hydrant there is no roof mounting system for this item. Should this have been a Woodford RHMC-MS Roof Hydrant. Please clarify.
	
	A:
	Refer to Addendum #4 for revisions.

90
	Structural Clarifications
	
	Q:

1) On sheet X/A531 detail A11 the architectural drawings show pedestals at each of the outdoor learning canopy columns, however the structural drawings don’t show a detail of these footings or the pedestal required by the architectural drawings. Please provide a clarifying details. 2) Sheet B/S201 of the Structural drawings for building B show 6 columns (outdoor learning area) outside of the building, however there are no footings or structural members called out for these. Please provide clarification as to what is required and a detail for these. 3) Informational - Gridlines for building E don’t match from Structural drawings to Architectural drawings. Architectural sheet E/A101 shows gridlines from 1 to 14. However Structural sheet E/S201 show gridlines from 1-12.
	
	A:
	1) Detail will be revised to show rebar in pedestal. Refer to Structural for Column and Footing size. 2) This will be clarified in a forthcoming addendum.
3) The Architectural Drawings will be revised to match.

90.1
	Structural Clarifications
	
	Q:
	1) Building A – Canopy (Trellis) Footing/Pedestal. Reference: A/S201, A/A201, F14/A/A504. Along Gridline A, there are square footings (assumed to be F5) with steel columns. A/A201 provides reference to F14/A/A504. This section/detail depicts a 1’-9” square CIP concrete base that sits on top of the square footings. Please clarify if the concrete base is to be reinforced. If so, please provide the reinforcement required. Similar at Buildings B, C, D, E, & K.
2) Building B – Canopy (Trellis) Footing/Pedestal. Reference: B/S201, B/A101, J11/B/A502. On B/A101, below Gridline G, there are what can be perceived as steel columns. On B/S201, there are no footings shown at those same locations. B/A101 provides reference to J11/B/A502. This section does not depict at footing or column. Please clarify if there are to be footings at these locations, as a part of add alternate #2.
3) Building E – Canopy (Trellis) Footing/Pedestal. Reference: E/S201, E/A101. On E/A101, along Gridline K and between Gridlines 1-5, there are (3) steel columns depicted. On E/S201, there are (2) steel columns & footings depicted. Please clarify if an additional footing (F5) is required.
4) Building E – Gridlines. Reference: E/S201, E/A101. The Structural and Architectural Gridlines do not match. E/S201 shows Building E between Gridlines 2-12. E/A101 shows Building E between Gridlines 2-14.
	
	A:
	1) This detail will be revised in a forthcoming addendum. 2) This will be revised in a forthcoming addendum.
3) Architectural will be revised in a forthcoming addendum. 4) Architectural will be revised in a forthcoming addendum. Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 03/02/03
NOTE: THE FORTHCOMING ADDEDNDUM NOTED IN THIS RFI RESPONSE REFERS TO ADDEDNDUM#4.

91
	Addendum 2 Plans
	
	Q:
	Reference Addendum 2: A/A501-E7 & E1, B/A502-A11 & A14, C/A501-E1, D/A502-A11 & E11. Addendum 2 revised floor plans at buildings A, B, C and D with added section views at each of the buildings. New section view details noted above were not provided. Please provide detail call outs on new section views per addendum 2.
	
	A:
	These revised sheets will be provided in the forthcoming addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 03/02/23

92
	Drywall at Exterior Perimeter Walls
	
	Q:
	
Reference: Floor Plans, Section 09 29 00 Gypsum Board.
On all floor plans legends notes and symbols there is a note stating stud walls and interior finish materials are to be continuous from floor to underside of floor or roof deck for walls with wall symbol with shading. All exterior wall symbols have shading per this note. Please note there are situations where exterior wall types B and/or D are shown directly in front of an interior non-full height walls. Please clarify if all exterior wall types B & D are to receive continuous interior wall materials full height to roof floor or deck per note? If so, please clarify if full height drywall may be installed full height at interior furred wall directly in front per the attached situation?
	
	A:
	All Walls indicated to have full height finishes shall be provided as indicated. The proposed solution of providing these finishes at interior furred walls is acceptable as long as the finishes are finishing from floor to deck as indicated.
-Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 03/02/23

Floor Finish
Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

93
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarification
	
	Q:
	On building A, there is a discrepancy on the floor finish in rooms 109 and 115. The Finish schedule on page X/A201 shows clear floor sealer (CFS) in room 109 and Carpet in room 115. The Interior Design Plan for floors page A/A801 shows Polished Concrete Color 1 in those rooms. In this case and any other cases with a conflict between the Finish Schedule and the Interior Design Plan, which one should we follow? Is the Finish Schedule the overriding authority? Please clarify.
	
	A:
	This will be clarified in a forthcoming addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Archietcts 03/02/23

94
	Floor Finish in B;dg. E Rooms 104 & 106
	
	Q:
	In Building E, as per the finish schedule (X/A202) we need to provide carpet broadloom in room 104 & 106. But in the finish plan E/A801 it is showing the hatch for polish concrete. Can you please conform which one we need to follow.
	
	A:
	A revised 801 sheet will be issued in the forthcoming addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 03/02/23

95
	HVAC Commissioning
	
	Q:
	Spec. Section 23 08 00, 3.4, C briefly references testing the air distribution systems. Is ductwork leakage testing required as part of the commissioning process? If so, which systems and what percentage of the ductwork is to be tested? Please provide more information on what is required.
	
	A:
	This will be clarified in a forthcoming addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Archietcts 03/03/23
Yes, ductwork leakage diagnostic testing is required as part of the functional performance testing and commissioning process for all conditioned space ductwork systems as covered within the specifications and as prescribed by the 2019 California Energy Code (CEC) Section 120.8(g) and Appendix NA2-1.
Hannah Brigdon, PE
Net Positive Consulting Engineers 03-02-2023

96
	Deck
	
	Q:
	Specifications indicate ASC as the basis and a web perforated acoustic deck. Structural indicates a Verco D/DA (dovetail) profile deck. They are not the same and ASC does not make a dovetail profile deck. Please advise what is to be provided.
	
	A:
	This will be revised in a forthcoming Addendum. -Andrew Corral, Darden Architects 03/02/23

97
	Paint
	
	Q:
	
1) The exterior elevations of the classroom buildings says paint PC-2 school logo mural. PC-2 is the elastomeric plaster system (not a paint system) per the exterior finish schedule. Does the Plaster Contractor apply the mural? Our scope says we do painted murals.
2) The classroom buildings have addresses on them as well. It just says paint color 2 & 3. I would figure those because it doesn’t say Pc-2 & PC-3, right?
	
	A:
	1) This will be addressed in a forthcoming Addendum. 2) Correct they are to be painted in the manner indicated on the elevations. The CM contractor will need to clarify this in the bid description if it is unclear.
Follow-up note: I am adding something to the addendum that is indicating this to be painted. We do not want Radiused control joints.

98
	OCIP Manual Clarification
	
	Q:
	For OCIP purposes, in the OCIP manual please confirm that the term ‘Subcontractor’ is synonymous with ‘Prime Contractor’ on this project. Each Prime Contractor will be contracted directly with the District, not with the Construction Manager. This project will have Prime Contractors and those Prime Contractors will have Subcontractors.
	
	A:
	For the purposes of the multi-prime contract the prime contractors would be responsible to meet all of the requirements in the OCIP manual currently listed as subcontractor. This template is typically utilized in a GC/Sub model. The primes would be responsible for each of the requirements.

99
	Bid Bond Form
	
	Q:
	On the bid bond form there is no place for the surety to sign, how do we proceed?
	
	A:
	Since the form is to be completed by Corporate Surety the Surety can use the last Attest field and cross out Corporate Principal and Write or Type in Corporate Surety.

OCIP Questions
Fowler McKinley Elementary - Increment No. 2	PRE-BID RFI LOG

RFI #
	DESCRIPTION

100
	Off Site Street Plans Specifications clarification
	
	Q:
	1) Per Addendum #1, OCIP document, page 3, Item a. “General Liability Deductibles: For Each Contractor per occurrence”, requirements state that Subcontractors shall be responsible for the first $5000 of any GL or Contractors Pollution Liability losses. Pollution Liability is not listed as an insurance coverage within the OCIP policy. Please confirm that OCIP provides this coverage for Subcontractors, and if so, what the policy limits are. Please also confirm that if Subcontractors are required to provides Pollution Liability, and if so, what the policy limits requirements are.
2) Pursuant to General Conditions, Section 00700, Article 16(j), Please confirm that Builder’s Risk Insurance is part of the Owner Provided Insurance Policies. If so, please confirm coverages for owner’s Builder’s Risk policy includes All Other Perils (AOP), Flood, and Earthquake, and provide coverage limits for each of these coverages. Please also confirm that, if this policy is part of the Owner Provided Insurance Policies, that the Contractor has no risk of loss outside of this policy for course of construction losses. Please also provide deductible limits that the Contractor would be responsible for.
	
	A: